Questo articolo su BIND9 si conclude con la dichiarazione:
The point I'm trying to make here is that BIND9 should not be exposed to the public. It has code problems that should be unacceptable in this day and age of cybersecurity. Even if it were written perfectly, it has far too many features to be trustworthy. Its feature-richness makes it a great hidden master, it's just all those feature get in the way of it being a simple authoritative slave server, or a simple resolver. They shouldn't rewrite it from scratch, but if they did, they should choose a safe language and not use C/C++.
Quando indago su C #, vedo questo da Eric Lippert , dicendo che C # non verrà mai compilato allo stesso identico binario dovuto alle modifiche del Colonna MVID.
Domanda
Esiste una combinazione di un linguaggio di programmazione e compilatore di tipo sicuro che genera build deterministici?